Godgrown

Updates from January, 2012 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  Mark 9:25 am on January 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Libya, Syria   

  Stay Soft 

     I’m reading Exodus 8 alongside 2 Corinthians 3 today — In Exodus, its the story of the 10 Plagues – exhibiting the hardness of Pharoah’s heart toward letting the Israelites go – he just couldn’t see the obvious evidence right there in front of him – he couldn’t understand that it was him doing the harm to the country!  He was torturing his own people by refusing to listen to to the will of God.

  It reminds me of Libya’s recent dictator, and Syria’s current debacle where the leaders of the country were obviously insane for destroying their own nation.  It was a classic example of the leader becoming obsessed with their own power, and end up eroding that power by trying to hold on to it.  In Pharoah’s case, as in Gaddafi’s and so many others, it led to the end of their very lives.  Power has such compelling, addictive qualities, and trying to relinquish it is eternally difficult.  

  But I am reminded of a “hardness of heart” far more sinister than even Pharaoh’s or Gaddafi’s.

  In 2 Corinthians 3, The hard heart is not in a single person, but an entire nation.  What started with an ecstatic worship experience at Mt. Sinai, where Moses was so close to the glory of God that his face had to be covered with a veil, as it was shining with glory!  Such was God’s glory that the Israelites asked not to be put it it’s presence for fear that they might die.  After all, look what happened to Pharaoh!

     Overtime, however, the hardness of heart creeps in like plaque, undoing the raw, beautiful experiences that brought us to the convictions we hold to today.  The hardness of heart in Israelites case feels more like the ebb and flow of the ocean on the rocks – at first it’s effects are imperceptible, but overtime, it’s power over stone is undeniable.

     In my life, the “hardness” I experience looks more like the Israelites’ picture of the problem, rather than Pharaoh’s.  It is the slow erosion of previous joyful worship experiences, of my earliest convictions, and sense of orientation.  It amounts to a casual walk through the woods- where the paths continue to wind and turn; at first the journey is light and enjoyable, but soon becomes a frightening, disorienting maze without end.

  So!   Hold on to your heart.  Hold on to hope!  Cynicism and doubt are a relentless downpour in our world.  Check your sources of input – do you watch nothing but the news?  Do you read anything but doom-and-gloom?  Then pick up a book of poems!  Pick up the Gospels!     Keeping your heart soft is possibly the most important task on earth, and its a daily habit.

  

  Mark W, and Jay Abels are discussing. Toggle Comments

   
  • 

    Jay Abels 12:33 pm on February 1, 2012 Permalink

    Have you ever wondered why we always call them “The 10 Plagues”?   In the biblical text, they are more often referred to as marvels and wonders.  I think we may identify more with the Egyptian slave holders than we do with the slaves that God freed through the wonders that he did in Egypt.

  • 

    Mark W 1:27 pm on February 1, 2012 Permalink

    Wow, very true!

  Reply Cancel reply

  Required fields are marked *

  Name *

  Email *

  Website

  

• 

  Mark 9:39 am on November 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: John Eldredge   

  What Does Love…Do? 

  Walking through Chicago, you see parents interacting with their kids all the time.  Walking down sidewalks, playing at parks, on the train, pushing strollers and wearing baby-wraps.  Kids being rewarded, and being disciplined.  Parenting styles of all kinds are on full display – some styles absolutely baffle me, others make me cringe…but there are times when you see a partent engage a child in such a way that it inspires not only the kid, but all watching, to live a better life.

  Many parents love their children, but few parents know how to put that love into constructive action.  What I mean is, sometimes we think we’re loving a child when we’re actually harming her.  Love is not as simple as a kiss on the cheek or handing them 50 candy-bars a day just to appease their wishes.

  Not being a parent myself, I can not assume I would be any different than countless well-meaning parents in Chicago – and my heart goes out to folks doing the most important work in the world, raising up the next generation.  It IS the most important work…which is why this question must be asked…

  What does Love do?

  I look to the perfect picture of familial love – the Father God and his Son Jesus Christ.  Review the Gospels to find what the most beautiful, ultimate parenting skills look like in action.  Re-read the Gospels with the eyes of how God ‘parented’ Jesus, and you may find that the Love of the Father sends his Son into Mission.

  I’ve seen some parents walking down the street with their two-year-old running about 20 feet behind them, frantically trying to keep up; I’ve seen other parents let their kids shoot ahead of them unawares, running at full-speed toward busy streets, and still others keep their kids on leashes, never leaving them out of their reach (with literal leashes~ or a GPS on their teen’s cell phone)!

  Watch the Father keep his Son intimately close for years, teaching him who He is and Whose He is.  At twelve years old, Jesus has a better grip on his identity and his mission than most adult Christian leaders.  Speaking to his earthly parents, who had LOST HIM at a city-festival, found  him in the Temple, and Jesus’ pre-teenage voice, cracking as he plainly said, “Why are you looking for me?  Didn’t you know that I must be where my Father’s work is!”  Potent — both intimacy and mission wrapped into one sentence…(Lk 2:48-50)

  As Jesus’ life progressed, he was sent out as the Light of the World, doing incredible work and breaking through the hardest barrier in the Universe – the human heart.  Even still, as a Good Father, God was ever-present and affirming of his Son, attuning regularly with Jesus in times of intimate prayer and communion.

  And it is in fact, the same relationship God hopes for all those chasing after the Jesus-Way.  We have a real opportunity to be “Fathered by God” – to find our true identity, and our true purpose and mission in life.  There are enough voices vying for our hearts and our dollars in this culture – it will take focus and intentionality to be fathered by God, but its worth it – not just for your own life, but for your children’s.

  
   
• 

  Mark 8:26 am on September 12, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

  Darwin, Survival and the Weakest 

  What really blows my mind about the Way of Jesus is that it is 100% opposed to the basic mantra and premise of Darwinian evolution.  Even Darwin, a Christian himself, must have seen the irony in this.  The basic premise to remember from 9th Grade biology class is something like this:

  “This world’s basic fundamental principle is: ‘Survival of the Fittest’” — only the strongest will make it to that momentous stage of reproduction and thus pass on their DNA.

  Jesus however, pointed his disciples to an entirely different set of principles — he set us free from a “survival” paradigm for something much, much better…

  Jesus says that it is not about the “Survival of the Fittest,” but the “Redemption of the Weakest.”  It is in this context that the Kingdom of God is played out in this world, acting as a heckler to the clanging chorus chanting the Darwinian refrain from their Grand Temple – the Marketplace – where contending organisms, organizations, corporations and conglomerations all compete for the “#1 spot” before they are trounced and more lives are ruined (both the rich and the poor).

  OK – so I’m off my soap box.  What does this look like in the practical?

  It means - Not caring or “fighting for your rights” – something we Revolutionary Americans have drilled into us – Jesus points us not to defending our respect from others, but by being a servant with no expectation of worldly recognition.

  It means that finally admitting to ourselves and confessing to our sex-obsessed culture, that “We can live without sex, but we cannot live without love.” (a quote by Shane Claiborne)

  It means, in the end, that your survival is not up to you, and in fact, there is no such thing as “survival,” it is a myth – for even the mighty T-Rex, King of the Reptiles, which should have ruled the earth, was subject to the way of all things – we are all dust, and to dust we shall return.  

  The “Fittest” among all of us is Death Himself.  Only he will “survive.”

  This may come as a “downer” to most, (myself included) but when the striving for survival melts away, in Christ we can seek  a grander goal – Redemption.  The word communicates so much:

  Redemption: (noun) An outside force bringing you to safety and completing in you your original and greatest potential. (my own definition)

  When its no longer up to you and “survival” is no longer the goal, then being the “fittest” no longer preoccupies every moment of your existence, and you can give yourself over to better things – like compassion, grace, and promoting the dreams of others.

  I’m not saying that “Survival of the Fittest” doesn’t exist in the world (Just watch any of the Mac Vs. PC commercials… or Animal Planet), I’m just saying that its not the only show on tonight.  Take a deeper look at the road that an Evolutionary Ethic takes you and takes our society.  Maybe Jesus’ basic commandments “Love the Lord your God with everything…and love your neighbor as yourself” is a good retort that creates dissonance in the siren-song of our culture – and brings us to a new matra:

  Redemption of the Weakest.

  

  Mark W, and Kate are discussing. Toggle Comments

   
  • 

    Kate 3:10 pm on September 12, 2011 Permalink

    Since I feel the need to support my namesake, I will share 2 comments: 1) Fittest does not necessarily mean strongest.  Fittest is really referring to the most successful given the constraints of the environment.  Thus things that have supported greater human survival, like compassion and helping others (not violence and raping), tend to have been genetically and socially passed on.  (Side note: There has been a lot of recent research in psychology providing more evidence that we are “hardwired” to help others.  For example, if you do things with the specific goal to make yourself feel better, you feel good momentarily.  If you do things to make others feel better, you feel good over a longer period.)  2) Survival refers to genes, not to actual people, although the person needs to survive long enough to produce children. 

    An idea you might find interesting that we discuss a lot in one of my labs is that idea that “survival of the fittest” might actually promote a specific mix of genes in a population and not just one specific gene.  So, for example, what is the ideal mix of introverts and extroverts for a population?  Conservatives and liberals?  Theists and atheists?

    Thanks for this brief respite from work!  Hope you and Katrina are doing well.

  • 

    Mark W 3:57 pm on September 13, 2011 Permalink

    Kate — Thank you so much for the thoughtful, intriguing comment!  
       I may have written this post with more provocation than was necessary, something I kick myself for only after its been published.  I actually think that there is a lot of realism/truth to Darwinism’s basic premise – and I think your interpretation of that premise is really cool — (eg. “fittest = most successful given constraints…”)  
       I realize that it is historically suspect to try to force two figures from very different times/places into a conversation – comparing Darwin’s and Jesus’s outlooks on life may be like trying to compare the works of Mozart and Shakespeare.  
       So moving forward cautiously on that point, I do think that the popular application of “survival of the fittest” is something that existed long before Darwin, even in Jesus’ day, and that Jesus’ teachings reorients the Darwinian basic premise. 
       In Jesus’ mind, success in life looks nothing like the definition of success society-at-large is trying to sell us.  They are ladders leaning up completely different walls.  One points to amassing as many points as possible (points = cash, relationships, toys, even things like “benevolence” etc)…the other sees the renunciation of self-promotion, for the sake of deeper truer life.  One teaching Jesus is famous for is “If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake, you will save it. And what do you benefit if you gain the whole world but lose your own soul?l Is anything worth more than your soul?” — 
       What do you think?  Are there conflicts in the essential ends…and means… for the teachings of Jesus, or are they complimentary?  
       Here’s a confession – although I see Jesus’ teaching one thing – I’m basically not living it out.  If I’m being honest with myself, I still seek self-promotion.  Dang it.

       I hear you saying in your comment that “compassion and helping others” have helped human survival as a whole — sort of a “macro” picture of Darwin’s claim, rather than focusing on the fate of one person.  And I find that really interesting/worth thinking more on.  My first blush response is, “Who was the caveman who made the switch?”  What I mean is – how does a society evolve from violence as the best strategy for survival to compassion, helping others?  When a society (say, like 3rd Century Ireland) is filled with violence and fear from Druidic gangs terrorizing towns and villages all over, how does a guy like St. Patrick turn the tide and reinterpret “survival of the fittest” to mean “community, peace, gardening, self-sacrifice,” etc?  This kind of holistic, systemic sea-change stuff really intrigues me.
       Again, thanks for your response.  Hope this comment is a positive contribution…and not just my usual blathering. I’d love any more thoughts/push-backs.  
    Peace! ///Mark