A Congregation of Tribes
In most congregations in the West today, there is an implicit notion that the gathering is made up of a collection of individuals.  This almost sounds preposterous to say – “Mark, what ELSE would it be?”  Keep reading to find out.
Think about it for a moment – all of our sermons, worship songs, liturgy, and more -
…either focus on the MONO (each attendee’s personal relationship with the Divine), with songs like “I love you Lord” and sermons focused on personal spiritual formation.
…or the MACRO (the congregation as a whole), with reading Scripture aloud, observing the sacraments as one body, and a preacher addressing the whole congregation monolithically.
The focus of the leaders of most congregations is two-fold – grow people up in the LORD, and grow the congregation as a whole.
But what if we saw our gatherings as a congregation of tribes? Â As a meetup of smaller communities? Â How might that change the priorities of the meeting?
- It would foster a sense of belonging among folks who might otherwise feel just like a “face in the crowd.”
- The possibility to of “break-out” sessions to discuss the sermon’s topic might be a regular congregational practice.
- Accountability to live out the topic of the sermon would be easy to do through a small group who has committed to one another.
- The congregation would begin to feel like a “extended family reunion” – and the real meat-and-potatoes of church life would begin to emerge at the family level – at the level of the small group/house church.
- The modern notion of “self” as an isolated individual would transform into a healthy, dynamic notion of “me and we together.”
- Sermons could focus not just on the individual, but each house church present – the assumption and context under which most of the New Testament was written!
This is just a list to get your mind working.  What might it look like if we stopped seeing the congregation as a random gathering of individuals, and starting seeing it as a meeting together of tribes – ready to display the multifaceted beauty of God in the world?

miller 5:43 pm on May 28, 2009 Permalink
great thoughts bro!
love is a verb…
as is trust!
Joey Elliott 12:45 pm on June 8, 2009 Permalink
I was linked to your blog from a mutual friend from high school.
Great thoughts. One thing to consider in response to your comment:
“The Teacher seems to think that there is no end to the making and studying of words (Ecc 12:12). And admittedly, we must use language to participate in the world. But can words really solve the problems of this world? No! Ya gotta get out there and do something!”
I think words can solve the problems of this world, if you consider “words” to be the Gospel of Jesus Christ as presented in the Bible, and if you consider “problems” to be our separation from God. Of course, these words are only going to be seen biblically if they are proclaimed faithfully in the context of authentic gospel community, which to your point is the context of “doing something”. Words, as in the Word of God, is different from words, as in our own. We shouldn’t throw away the former just because we don’t like the latter. Actions without words (the gospel word) is as damaging as words without actions. I’m sure you agree, I just have felt the need to articulate that to people a lot recently.
Now that I’ve read only one of your blog posts and taken one sentence directly out of context (which is my pet peeve) I’ll try to keep up on your blog more often. Because it is great stuff! God Bless.
Mark 2:55 pm on June 8, 2009 Permalink
Joey,
Thanks for your thoughts. I agree that the Word of God is something that is verbal and essential to the substance of our faith. Proclaiming the Word in season and out of season is crucial! My main drag on this post was on our many tags we all put on Christianity that seem to only slow us down and divide us. Even the term “Christianity” is becoming more of a hassle than helpful for sharing the Word of God in my context here in Chicago. When I find myself putting adjectives infront of my discipleship (missional, emergent, organic, incarnational) I realize they are helpful to a certain extent, but then I just need to put those tags aside, and just DO!
Thanks for your thoughts and I look forward to hearing from you again.