Updates from February, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Mark 10:41 am on February 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    A Brief Briefing on Christian History 

    Most Protestants approach church history and spiritual formation as though nothing of significance occurred between the closing of the New Testament canon in the first century and the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century!

    As we are considering what a rich spirituality looks like in the twenty-first century, let’s make this the moment when the Church reintroduces itself into the powerful, expansive history filled with resources and insights to propel us forward.

    If we want to know how to connect with God in a deep way, if we want to avoid the common pitfalls that Christian communities make on their way to spiritual maturity, (there are at least 12 I’ve counted, but that’s for another day) and if we are interested in changing our lives and the lives of the people in our faith communities – we’ve got to make this a crucial part of our faith journey.

    3 Parts – the Ancient, Medieval and Modern Spiritualities

    Think of these three eras as shaped like an hourglass.  The ancient church (Pentecost to 600CE) was characterized by rapid exampsion to the continents of Asia, Africa, and Europe.  The medieval church (c.600-1500) was marked by withdrawal as internal divisions and the rise of Islam greatly diminished the Christian influence in Asia and Africa.  The modern church (c.1500-present) saw a new expansion beyond the boundaries of Europe, and in the past few decades the churches of the third world have shown the greatest vitality, expansion and missionary fervor.

    The ancient church – after it became the official religion of the Roman Empire, was rapidly transformed from a network of periodically persecuted believers into a geo-political bishop-states.  While some bishops used their power to fight off doctrinal heresies – (Montanism, Gnosticism, and Neo-Platonism) – others left the Christian empire to pursue desert spirituality, creating monastic orders.

    Christianity became a largely European phenomenon throughout the Middle Ages.  The Western and Eastern branches of the Church (Edessa, and Constantinople) formerly separated during this period.  The Eastern church became increasingly apophatic (mystical in their theology, and their spiritual disciplines – like listening prayer and stillness).  Monasticism flourished in the West, with Benedictine, Carthusian and Cistercian orders continued to develop contemplative and ascetic approaches to spirituality.

    Modern Spirituality begins with the impact of the four branches of the Protestant Reformation (Lutheran, Reformed, Anabaptist, and Anglican Spirituality).  Each of these understood their relationship to the state in a different light, as well as HOW the church in the West needed to transform.  In the Catholic Church, fantastic spiritual thinkers emerged in Spain and France during this time.  As Christianity found new territory in the far West Americas, new post-Reformation Protestant movements (Puritans, Quakers, Pietists, Evangelicals, revivalism, Methodists, holiness groups, and Pentecostals).  Most recently in our time, we’re seeing the Catholic Church fundamentally reformed in Vatican II, as well as other movements (ecumenical, charismatic, twelve-step spirituality, psychological approaches, and creation-centered spirituality).  Finally – the seeds of Eastern Orthodoxy and Christian developments in Latin America, Africa and Asia are finally making a real impact on the Church of the West after years of isolation.

    This is about as brief as one could span through the movements of 2000 years of Christian Spirituality.  If you’re truly interested in learning more, I recommend a few books to get you started!

    Share
     
  • Mark 11:29 am on February 7, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    The Other Side of the Horse 

    Much has been written in the last decade or so of the growing house church movement in the West.  As a church planter investing in simple forms of community development and sustainable, viral faith communities, I welcome this new movement to America!  But there is something lacking in most house churches in Americaa real sense of the “congregation.”

    Humans have a tendency to fall off one side of the horse, only to get back on and promptly fall right off the other side.  Mega-churches captured our attention with the regional impact, dynamic programs and preaching, and resource capabilities in the 1970-90′s, and forerunners like Bill Hybels and Rick Warren still shape the American Christian conversation in essential ways.  But sometime in the mid 1990′s, the “emerging church movement” erupted and fresh expressions of “micro church” began counter-balancing congregations with 10,000+ members.

    Missionaries from around the world began contributing to the ecclesiology of America – saying essentially, “Look, this church planting thing has been our main project for centuries – and we mostly plant churches in people’s homes.”  Many American Christians thought – if it works around the world, why not America too?

    The trouble began when just anyone started planting a little church in their living room, for any reason at all under both positive (let’s share Jesus with our neighbors) and negative motivations (let’s react against the abuses of the churches I’ve been a part of).

    The end result was that many house churches, even ones that really strive for health, simply cannot do what the mega-church can do!  There are simply not enough hands on deck in a group of 12 people; not enough resources (financial and otherwise), not enough diversity to build a fully functional Body of Christ in an area.  For folks that staunchly hold to the local autonomy of a house church, I wish you well, but I’ll expect to see your house church in the intensive care unit before the end of the year!

    If we don’t want to fall off the “other side of the horse” we must rely on an extended family. The church in the New Testament, while each one of them gathered for worship and lived out Kingdom life in a local house church, realized a greater “Church” that they depended on that existed beyond their walls.  This MACRO Church, connected communities in a given city or region, offers healthy leadership, the financial support, the complete spiritual gift matrix, and much more.  It is an interdependent community of communities; a node of resources that helps spiritually form both the individual, and contributes to the health of each house church!

    The mega-church can find this balance with real small-groups that aren’t just another program for people to attend; and a house church can find the same balance by connecting with or forming a real network of a dozen or so house churches that bring diversity and regional leadership.  Hugh Halter and Matt Smay in their book And: The Gathered and Scattered Church help put more form to this concept.

    Sign up for MACRO!

    If you are a part of a small group, house church, or congregation – and you’re ready to explore the practical implications of developing a healthy balance  in Christian community, Godgrown is releasing MACRO March 1st – sign up and invite others in your community to learn alongside you!

    Share
     
  • Mark 8:17 am on January 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Kicked Out for Good Reason 

    Sometimes going on a mission trip feels more like you’re just getting kicked out of the house.

    The writer in Isaiah 61 is depicting a nation of exiles, with some who have returned back to Jerusalem, and most others who have decided they will stay spread across the lands.  The writer is grappling with the changing definitions of what it means to be “God’s people” and it is slowly becoming more inevitable that we are never going back to “those old glory days where everyone is home in Zion” ever again.

    We long for what we had – we seem to only appreciate something or someone once they are gone.  And yet, the 5th Century prophet in this chapter is careful not to exclude the Diaspora Jews from the grand narrative God is weaving.  He seems to have an assurance that they still have a vital role to play.  The prophet is reminded of a promise God made to an ancient ancestor…”back in the glory days”… when he spoke to Abraham in Genesis, he made it explicitly clear that Abraham would be blessed, and that through Abraham all the nations of the earth would be blessed.

    This was spinning through the prophet’s mind as he wrote Isaiah 61.  In trying to reorient  his faith to the changing circumstances, in lamenting the hundreds of thousands of Jews that could not or chose not to return, what was to become of God’s people?  God’s promise to Abraham?

    Maybe this was exactly what God wanted.

    This “exile” – this humiliation and defeat – was exactly what God needed to propel the Jews out into every town and village and empire on earth. Like blowing on the head of a dandelion, the exile kicked the Jews out of the house, and put them unknowingly on a mission trip!

    How did that mission go?  Well – with no Temple to worship at, Jews began meeting in their homes for prayer and began studying the Torah as households.  Soon, they began setting aside parts of their house and then whole houses for prayer – they called these synagogues (Hebrew for “gathering together”).  They were public discussion forums on fearing God, and living a holy life.

    A few hundred years later, their Messiah came – but he came to the local region of Judea, and not all the exiled Jews had a chance to learn about the new age of grace – so more Jews, now committed to Jesus the Messiah, hit the Roman roads and traveled across the globe to tell Jews…and the rest of us… about this new Messiah King.  We are still on that project today!

    In the middle of what seemed like defeat, the writer of Isaiah 61 understood that there was a needed reorientation of his faith to understand God’s next chapter.

    —— ///

    Could you do the same? Is your faith strong enough in God’s promises that even a disaster would not shake them?  Would you fight to get things back to the way they were, or would you reinterpret what God’s promises really meant in light of the latest circumstance?

    If this prophet had demanded a hard line drawn between the remnant who returned home and those who remained abroad, we may not have had the infrastructure of prayer homes and synagogues ready for a the Gospel message to be shared across the Roman Empire.

    Keep your thoughts on the promises of God, not on “the glory days” which are always slipping away.  You’ll find his promises stick.

    Share
     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel