Posts Mentioning RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Mark 7:02 am on June 19, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Tell an Alternative Story 

    Neither revolution nor reformation can ultimately change a society, rather you must tell a new powerful tale, one so persuasive that it sweeps away the old myths and becomes the preferred story, one so inclusive that it gathers all the bits of our past and our present into a coherent whole, one that even shines some light into the future so that we can take the next step… If you want to change a society, then you have to tell an alternative story.

    – Ivan Illich, Austrian Philosopher

    • Share/Bookmark
     
    • millertalbot 9:07 am on June 19, 2009 Permalink

      any revolution that lacks a alternate story is not a revolution

      and our story, regardless of how different it is, is sterile if it doesn’t lead to revolution

      peace

  • Mark 10:28 am on May 22, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Tribes: The New Way to Change the World 

    Ever wondered how to change the world with the thing you’re most passionate about?  Watch this video to find out:

    I read Godin’s book Tribes earlier this year, and found it enlightening.  This video is a quick summary of the book by the author, plus his theory on a process for those interested in changing the world.  He looks over countless organizations, and through history at movement leaders and then draws some conclusions.  Why is it that Ghandi was successful in bringing about liberation and true change in India?  How did Martin Luther King rally a battered and bitter people into a movement of civil rights?

    tribes-process

    It begins by telling a story.  Frederick Buechner is quoted saying,

    To truly tell the story of anything well is to tell the story of everything.
    And while I’ll need your help in the comments section below to help me on the author of this quote, another tribal storyteller said,
    If you want to change the world, tell an alternative story.
    The story will enlighten some, and enrage others.  Don’t spend all your time coddling those who you are upsetting – focus on those who are ready to dive headlong into the story you both believe in.
    Next, you must connect your tribe.  Most people are most interested in the connection anyway!  Find fresh and exciting ways for those passionate about similar values to meet and engage one another to see spontaneous connections made.
    Ask yourself: “Who am I already leading?”  Focusing on leading is where change comes from.  In fact, people are waiting on you to lead them.  That is what it means to lead a movement for change – to ask questions, to build consensus, to peak curiosity, to develop a new tribal language…but its ultimately about your willingness to be committed to the cause.  That is what separates the tribes that matter from those that don’t.  Your willingness to lead a tribe through any circumstance is essentially the tribe’s best chance at meaningful change in the world.
    Tribes are where change comes from.  From the ballot box, to the grocery store (check out the new WikiChoice), to the church – committed tribes of regular people making extraordinary decisions and seeing dramatic change.  So get out there and lead your tribe – we need you to.
    • Share/Bookmark
     
    • miller 7:18 am on May 24, 2009 Permalink

      good stuff Mark! i’m not sure i’m with you all the way on this but i love how you stress connection to those who want to be connected. we need to cut loose from those who just want to argue or resist. focus on those who are in!

      i like the visual of a tribe… i also love the visual of a caravan. there’s an old saying “the dogs bark, but the caravan moves on!”

      we gotta keep rolling because there’ll be some in each place we pass through who’ll climb aboard and come along.

      peace

  • Mark 9:05 am on May 7, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    The Kingdom Flu 

    We’ve heard plenty about Swine Flu – its potency now seems to be waning, while the media-virus continues to spread like its the only thing the news wants to report on.  That along with a conversation I had the other day with several church planters got me thinking about the nature of the gospel and the American Church.

    1st Question: Is the gospel a virus?

    2nd Question: If so, is the church in America spreading the contagious gospel virus?

    3rd Question: If not, is the American Church really spreading the gospel?

    Last Christmas, I wrote about the message of God becoming a “virus of peace” that began in the stables of a Jewish city (no swine there I’m guessing) and the contagion spread into the hearts and minds of people out to the vast reaches of the Roman Empire until it collapsed under its weight.  Even the Emperor Constantine knew his best political strategy was to adopt the virus of love and peace and mutate it into his own version. After the anti-virus, Christians were no longer threats to the Empire, they were the strongest supporters and defenders of it.  The HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH was born.

    But it wasn’t just Constantine who thought he could weild and redirect the voracious gospel disease, we see the gospel spread to other parts of the world, and at times it is derailed and sterilized into a philosophy, or an institution, or a culture (not the kind in a petri dish).  An often referenced quote of mine by Pricilla Shrier,

    In the first century in Palestine, Christianity was a community of believers. Then Christianity moved to Greece and became a philosophy. Then it moved to Rome and became an institution. Then it moved to Europe and became a culture. And then it moved to America and became a business.

    Now, I believe that the gospel has picked up important things along the way, but I think too often it has adopted to the culture, instead of adapting to the culture.  Here in America, if we as a culture assume a position of business, then the gospel virus should subvert and infuse the business world with all the revolutionary power of the first century gospel – not simply become a consumer-religion.

    The virus, to spread, must learn to adapt – meaning those infected with God’s good news must learn to reimagine what it means to be contagious. If the gospel isn’t spreading, we should wonder if the church has not become itself the anti-virus.  I hear all the time those who say, “I love Jesus – but I hate the Church.”  I don’t think there should even be a difference between the two.

    My question I ask myself and those who are part of the underground network is: “What if it works?” What if the way we live for Christ now works – and people’s lives are changed forever.  What if it works – and a cascading population of millions becomes sick with the virus of God’s peace in this city… What IF its a movement that cannot be contained by the religious elite, the scholars, or the politicians of our world today?  It no longer is a tame, resting lion, but a fierce beast charging after darkness and like Aslan, covering the world in Good.

    Here are a few thoughts on the shape of this new, strange virus, this Kingdom Flu I’m seeing beginning to take out unsuspecting Americans:

    • a cooperative spirit – willing to work side-by-side with others, Christian and otherwise, to see God’s work accomplished in this city.
    • a fever of boldness – bravery and abandonment to a cause that transcends fearfulness.
    • not sweating the small stuff – God’s mission to transform the whole city is the primary goal that brings together God’s Church.  The Whole Church brings the Whole Gospel to the Whole City.
    • a sneeze of churches – churches that spread not by addition (one church planting another church every 3-5 years) but one church’s love becoming so contagious that it’s people are penetrating every nook and cranny of society, and seeing myriad churches begin simultaneously.
    • Share/Bookmark
     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel