Tagged: Articles RSS

  • Mark 8:47 am on August 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Articles, , CO2, Life Transformation Groups, ,   

    Micro Rhythms 

    Our Micro is really blossoming in some wonderful and formative ways.  (Read more on the Micro Layer.)

    It began with going strictly by the LTG brochure you can read all about on CMA’s website, 25-30 chapters of God’s Word each week, 10 character-conversation questions (accountability) and praying for the “sojourners” in our lives.  We then tossed in some material from CO2 (Church of 2), learning to tap into what is going on in “my heart, your heart, and God’s heart.”  We found both of these structures helpful and we flow pretty seamlessly between both of them.

    We read plenty of God’s Word. We use YouVersion.com‘s free, customizable Reading Plans to stay in sync with each other – each day reading the same Scriptures and dwelling in the Word – letting God speak to us as we cultivate a spirit of “listening prayer.”

    We check in with each other…as close to daily as possible. At the end of our reading and journaling, we take 5 minutes to write an email to the group – writing what we thought about, prayed about and heard from God during our reading.  It gives us a daily “check-in” opportunity, even when we are not meeting up with each other in the flesh.  When we meet up once a week, we don’t have to spend all our time going over the minute details of our life because we already know!  Instead, we check in spiritually -

    “What are the deep issues of your heart, today?” “What are you hearing from God?  What are you doing about it?  How can we help you?”

    We usually have more than enough to share with each other!

    We confess sin to each other. Each week we ask, “Is there anything we need to confess today?”  Sometimes its sin that is shared, other times its a testimony!  When sin is confessed, the others listen closely to the one confessing, and when everything is said, they respond by saying,

    “I hear what you are saying.  You’re right – this is sin, and wrong…but God forgives you.”

    Hearing these words is like salve to the soul…

    We pray for harvest workers and for the lost in our city. We meet at 9:00am-10:30am each week – and at 10:02am our cell phone will chime reminding us to pray the pray we read in Luke 10:2 - “Pray to the Lord who is in charge of the harvest to cast out workers into his harvest field!” We take a few moments to thank God for what he is doing in Chicago, and to plead that God open up the hearts of those we know who are searching for truth.

    After 9 months – this is what our Micro looks like.  It has embedded within it the seed of a faith community – and while our group may not look exactly like others that start, our rhythms can easily be passed on and re-molded in countless ways.  Have you thought of trying it?  It’s AWESOME!  More and more Micros are starting in our house church network all the time, and I believe it makes us healthier.

    I wouldn’t give up my Micro for anything – it is a chance to be real.  It is a band of brothers.  It is the core and starting place of mission.  It is life transforming!

    Share
     
  • Mark 2:30 pm on June 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Articles   

    Layers of Christian Community: Mondo 

    God’s sights for Jesus’ mission was not merely set on religious renewal among the Jews, starting the Church, or even creating a new religion for all peoples.  God’s sights were and still are set on world transformation – on creating a new heaven and new earth!  The game plan since the beginning, since the Garden, has always been about up-ending the brokenness of this world and cultivating a new heaven and new earth right here in our neighborhood.  That’s why Jesus came as a human, to introduce a new kind of human, a new kind of world – what he called “The Kingdom of God.”

    This world transformation is the central mission of God, meaning that “the church” is not God’s only project on earth.  God’s glory fills the WHOLE earth (Hab 2:14)  Unfortunately, too often “church growth” and even “church planting” is the ultimate goal of many Christians today.  But the true purpose of the Church must be the same goal as Jesus’ mission - showing the world the Kingdom of God is near! (Mark 1:15)  This Kingdom of God is our world-transformed.  And our proclaiming that brand-new-in-every-way world is the WHOLE GOSPEL.

    Unfortunately, the Church is better at proclaiming a part of the Gospel (“saving souls for heaven” or merely “doing good works for earth”).  In addition, the church as a whole often is many times so distrusting of itself and so disorganized that it rarely makes any real strategic attempt at accomplishing its goal – to display the WHOLE GOSPEL before the world.

    The church in many places is about as unified as a box of toothpicks dumped out onto a table. But with a little intentionality, those toothpicks can begin to spread out over the table like spokes on a wheel.  The same is true for the church – we must work together to see a saturation of Jesus Christ presented before every tongue, tribe and nation; not uniting under one denomination, doctrine, or project, but under one mission:

    …getting the WHOLE CHURCH to give the WHOLE GOSPEL to the WHOLE WORLD!

    Mondo Layer

    So what is the Mondo Layer?  It is the “Church Universal” as many have called it before.  Throughout all time and space, there is only one Body, one Faith, and one Lord over all of us. (Eph 4:1-4) Its the common bond we can feel with St. Francis of Assisi or Martin Luther King Jr. or a Christian from the other side of the world.

    The Mondo Layer gives us access to the same Holy Spirit that inspired the Church Fathers and Mothers to write the classics that are with us to this day.  The Syriac Fathers to Margery Kempe, Celtic Spirituality to the Anabaptists… they offer us multiple streams of living water and each display for us a piece of the Kingdom that would otherwise be lost to us today.  Many Christians are anemic – even though they live deeply into the Mono, Micro, Meso and Macro Layers, simply because they do not access the Mondo Layer – the Church Universal, where the Holy Spirit is waiting to bring unity and family to us through time and space.

    There are three measures for unity in the Universal Church (not just anyone can be a part of God’s called-out people), theological (doctrine, right belief), functional (producing fruit that resembles Christ’s life), and relational unity (we are only unified when we practice unity!).  But truthfully, there is something even more important in discovering Christian unity.  What Barton Stone called “Fire Unity” – which is the union of God’s Spirit to humanity.  In Stone’s words,

    How vain are all human attempts to unite a bundle of twigs together, so as to make them grow together and bear fruit! They must first be united with the living stock, and receive its sap and spirit, before they can ever be united with each other. So must we be first united with Christ, and receive his spirit [sic], before we can ever be in spirit united with one another. The members of the body cannot live unless by union with the head—nor can the members of the church be united, unless first united with Christ, the living head. His spirit is the bond of union. Men have devised many plans to unite Christians – all are vain. There is but one effectual plan, which is, that all be united with Christ and walk in him.”

    Mondo Lived Out

    The Church Universal is a great feel-good concept- that we are all one in Christ.  The problem is, you cannot work toward unity with the Pope, because you’ll (likely) never meet him.  You can only express unity with Christians in your actual life - where you actually have some practical say over whether or not you live in unity with your brothers and sisters so vastly different from you.  So, maybe you’ll never meet the Pope, but what about the church on other side of town?  What about the mega-church down the street, or the black church downtown?  The truth is – the functional portion of the Mondo Layer is seen in the city-church.

    “In the NT, there are three fundamental dimensions of the church: the believers who frequently gather as a house church; the believers that periodically gather as a local (city) church; and the entire community of believers in Christ who do not have an opportunity to meet but of which each believer is a part.” — Rex Koivisto

    This is bigger than any one congregation or church network (also called the Macro Layer).  It is the entire Christ-centered community in a given city or area. It is the City-Church you hear about it Acts 14:23, Titus 1:5, and the seven churches in Revelation.  There is no “North Side Ephesian Church” or “1st Church of Philippi.”  Paul either addressed “the church that meets in Lydia’s house” (the Meso Layer) or “to the church in Ephesus,” (the Mondo Layer).  This was how Paul understood God’s people – not divided, but united – each house church living out the Kingdom life locally, and all the Christians living in a certain city or region working together to display the Kingdom to their own local Empire.

    How does this get lived out today?  How does the churches-in-the-city become one city church?  Well, to start, it is more organic than organizational.  Built around the love-centered relationship of the Trinity, it overcomes ethnic, denominational, ecclesiastical and socioeconomic prejudice.  Second, a shift must take place in the hearts of churches and church leaders in particular.  So many churches today are territorial, and short-sighted on seeing their own church succeed.  We must begin to see ourselves as one network of God’s people.

    So, we don’t all meet downtown at the civic center as one church – we remain lots of congregations and organic church networks all doing lots of ministries and mission efforts …but we are one Church with one goal for our city – to see it transformed into God’s vision for his world!

    Mondo Strategy

    Living out the Mondo Layer means the church working together as a “network of networks.”  It means fighting the apathy, rugged individualism and frankly ignorance that turn the mission work of God into a box of toothpicks randomly dumped onto the table.

    Living into the Mondo Layer means living into the strategy of Christ – the Great Commandment (love) and the Great Commission (love sent).  The result is “saturation church planting.”  Churches across the city must find unity in the goal of city-wide transformation through the process of seeing a vibrant family of Jesus in close reach of every single person in their city.  This is a comprehensive look at the city, and doing everything in their power (nothing more, nothing less) to offer the Gospel for every people, and a spiritual family for every person.  Only 30-40% of our city will/can be reached by traditional churches, which is why we must invest (spiritually, financially) into emerging, organic, and neo-monastic expressions of Christ’s church.

    Leaders with this vision might be called “Missional Resource Teams,”  listening to God and living out the life of God for a particular area with the core conviction that “mission flows from listening.”  Spiritual mapping aides in the process of saturation church planting (Pray4Chicago is an example of such a project), as does praying for workers through a Luke 10:2 prayer.

    Its possible that each year, major city-wide celebrations and worship festivals can begin to breakout.  Leadership conferences, mission efforts, and  other gatherings emerge, as families grow in Christ and peace reigns on earth.  These and other pictures of heaven CAN happen this side of eternity, if we have eyes to see it and the heart to live it out in our lives.

    The Layers

    Mono, Micro, Meso, Macro, and Mondo.  They are all wrapped up together like an onion, or a sea shell.  You cannot live in one and not the others if you want to be healthy.  They are a part of God’s life for us here on earth – the expression of his church at work in the world.

    Living into these layers, we can begin to know ourselves better, experience love and trust from others, belong to a meaningful family, and engage in significant mission.  But it all spirals out from a life of intimacy with a loving God, who is at the center of it all.

    Share
     
    • Jay Abels 3:15 pm on June 30, 2010 Permalink

      It is interesting how the onion analogy has migrated. Decades ago it was used to describe the stripping away of material in the Gospels that was not authentic to reveal the true core Jesus. See Bultmann’s demythologizing. Many have observed that no matter how much you strip away the layers of an onion, it is still onion all the way down. Sadly some have stripped away selectively to come up with a twisted Jesus, but no matter how much they have tried to warp him, there is always that onion smell that won’t go away. I like your use of the onion. It is interesting how they grow new layers from the inside out, but the outer layers also keep growing so they don’t split open. Keep up the good work.

    • Mike H 8:59 pm on February 10, 2011 Permalink

      Nice Article. I guess its a little over my head tho. What happend to just reading the bible and going to church. Does it really need to be this difficult.

  • Mark 11:38 am on April 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Articles   

    Our Leader is Instinct 

    When I think about church leadership, I like the concept of parents. It remains very relational and organic…and it reminds me of the language in the New Testament (God = Father) (Paul describes himself as a “mother” to his churches).

    However, I’ve been wondering about power and leadership and how it becomes consolidated over time. We all know parents who abuse their power, (hopefully not as many as there are parents who love and nurture their kids).

    Lately, I’ve been thinking about rotating leadership. Much like a V-Formation (sometimes called “skein”) in migratory birds – the front bird gets assaulted with major turbulence, and must rotate out with another bird every so often to fly faster and longer than they could alone!

    What I love about this image is that EVERY bird knows which direction they need to go.

    There is leadership…but no permanent leader…except the “instinct” in all of them to fly north. When one gets tired, the others know exactly what to do and where to go, and help him out of the most dangerous position to find a place of rest in the back of the flock.

    My own push-backs on the metaphor…

    Is this irresponsible to the “youngest” in the family? How can a family “rotate” parenthood? …and wouldn’t we as a church have to be GOING somewhere? (as in, some churches are sitting on their duffs!)

    From Wikipedia’s “V-Formation” entry:

    The V formation greatly boosts the efficiency and range of flying birds, particularly over long migratory routes. All the birds except the first fly in the upwash from the wingtip vortices of the bird ahead. The upwash assists each bird in supporting its own weight in flight, in the same way a glider can climb or maintain height indefinitely in rising air. In a V formation of 25 members, each bird can achieve a reduction of induced drag by up to 65% and as a result increase their range by 71%. The birds flying at the tips and at the front are rotated in a timely cyclical fashion to spread flight fatigue equally among the flock members. The formation also makes communication easier and allows the birds to maintain visual contact with each other.

    Share
     
    • Jesse Cox 1:57 pm on April 10, 2010 Permalink

      I think this metaphor misses it in many ways. We are not a flock of birds, alone in our journey, with only our instinct to guide us. Instinct, I think, has little to do with church leadership. We have almost 2k years of the Church, thousands (tens, hundreds of thousands?) of saints, the writings of the church, and of course the Scriptures to guide us. Instinct, if we indeed have anything like it, usually takes us away from God. When we do see “instinct” in someone that leads them towards God, it is a finely honed, disciplined, practiced walk with God, rather than something we all as Christians possess.

      Another way this misses the mark is that not all of us want to be leaders, at least not in the perhaps worldly way that we tend to think of leadership. I have some experience with that: in our church in Seattle we attempted a very democratic way of organizing our Sunday liturgy -EVERYBODY was expected to take a turn at planning it. Unfortunately, not everyone was good at it and some that were were not interested in doing it. It just didn’t work out.

      Where this metaphor is valid though is when we put leadership in its proper context: the “leader” as we tend to think of him/her should be perhaps the least important person in the church. In this way everyone “gets their turn”: the children lead, the humble lead, the weak lead, the skilled lead, the “leader” leads, but everyone serves. Everyone must submit to each other. The church is not just a spiritual body – it is also a physical body and even worldly, in a way of thinking. However, we shouldn’t be fooled into thinking that this worldly face is worth anything, that “leadership” is worth anything, or that it is actually the whole of the church. If we ignore the leadership of the humble the church will be an empty shell, no matter if it looks like it is going somewhere or not.

    • Mark 9:26 am on April 14, 2010 Permalink

      Jesse,

      It took a few days for me to get back to this comment, just because I think it raises an important point.

      Yes, birds fly with instinct, but the metaphor translates to the church when “instinct” becomes the Holy Spirit – filtered through the whole counsel of God. I agree that history, hagiography, theology, philosophy… “communities of informed judgment” as I’ve called them elsewhere in this blog – are brought to bear their very best wisdom and gifts to the community.

      Much like 1 Cor 14:26 – “When you meet together, one will sing, another will teach, another will tell a special revelation… etc” this is what I’m thinking of when I say “shared” leadership.

      And not just leadership in our gathering for worship – I think our church VISION should come from a collaboration of folks in the community.

      This is not the same as a “democracy” we are in a theocracy – a King who is God is our leader – the rest of us are just a few steps behind…and no one is ever the sole-proprietor of God’s voice or instructions for where to go next.

      Keep pushing on this with me if ya like – I love this kind of learning…

    • Nathan 7:15 pm on April 17, 2010 Permalink

      Mark, I like this a lot. The idea that there is a rotation works really well if leadership is understood to be among peers. Leadership in the home is different because its symbiotic. I and my wife were part of the birthing process for God to bring our child into the world and are responsible thus to provide an environment that treats parenting as a stewardship of our relationship to our child, not a leadership position. Parenting requires leadership like a house requires walls. So parenting isn’t leadership, it just requires leadership to be done and there is no use comparing or separating them. What parenting doesn’t require but actually should be – is stewardship. Parents don’t have to think like or be stewards to be parent their children but they do have to be leaders, its inherent to the process. So stewardship is the challenge.

      The connection for me is that new birth requires leadership. The kind of leadership that you are talking about is leadership shared among peers who, generally speaking, are at very similar levels of competence, maturity and communicated investment. I love the idea of a 12 year old leading a Bible study, as long as they understand that they are doing so with encouragement and “leadership” from a group of people who represent the flock of birds responsible for rotating the front lead. Over exposure to leadership responsibilities for those not ready or seasoned can lead to immense damage or debilitating pride.

      So it seems that it is better to have a group of leaders sharing the front who represent different ilks of influence, gifting and personality. They all can provide an environment where those that are birthed and/or are maturing can grow in praxis and conviction. At the end of the day it does take a group of people to determine who is growing, how they can help them grow and at what stage of growth or need for birth they are at. Whoever ends up doing this will be by default – the leaders. They should represent a variety of influences and giftings and experiences as much as possible. Regardless, whomever ends up evaluating those that are growing and providing the environment for growth and maturity to take place – they are the leaders and the others aren’t.

      The point though for leaders is to not be leaders from a desire for power but from a desire to ultimately empower others through their self designed disempowerment as they transfer power and decision making to increasingly competent and maturing individual and communities. (This is all very ideal – but that is the nature of theory)

      I think what you’re getting at, is that at whatever point a community is at in that process different members of the leading community need to be the “point person” and take the helm. After they’ve taken the helm for whatever project or period of time that they were needed, they then give up the “point person” positioning as a reflection of how they need to be growing in health and encouraging the community to grow in health. this is done by leaders making space for other leaders to lead and by “making sheep into shepherds” as they mature. The leaders are ultimately supposed to work themselves out of a job continuously in order to reflect health, accountability,.proper pedagogy and continual community transformation. Leadership is then a paradox – Leaders are people who work themselves out of leadership continuously in order to empower others, thereby solidly establishing their identity as leaders and hence their leadership.

      I like your idea as well, because the birds are from Canada.

    • Mark 10:23 am on April 18, 2010 Permalink

      You know Nathan, this reminds me of a parent helping a child learn how to tie his shoe. The truth is, if the parent wanted complete control of the child, the parent would never teach the kid how to tie the shoe, thus keeping the child dependent on the parent forever. And truth be told, its easier just to tie the dang shoe, than to take the time to stop, take about two weeks of intense training, laying one lace over the other making a bow, etc…

      But any parent will tell you that a chunk of time invested in teaching a child to tie his own shoe will save the parent many countless hours later on in life. The control must be passed from the parent to the child. If leadership remains in the hands of one leader, then the shoe metaphor says that the family will never walk farther than the leader will let them go. Control and power must be passed around – because one day, when the parent is weak and paralyzed with old age, the child will be tying the shoes of the parent.

    • Nathan Smith 1:21 am on April 19, 2010 Permalink

      Cool continuation Mark! Teaching a man how to fish starts when he’s a child. What would you say to the idea empowering leaders who are in the same age bracket and life experience as you but because of circumstances or historical hardships have been held back in their ability to mature in certain areas of life, practice or propriety?

      I’m thinking of post-colonialism – the leadership (albeit that it sucked and was imperialistic) of the colonial era was static until it was removed. The removal was so swift and many times so pervasive that the leadership vacuum in many of these countries was more like a leadership black hole that swallowed them up. Only now are some of these countries pulling themselves out of the ruin, civil unrest and tragedy of post colonial vacancies and tragedies. Many were expected to operate within systems created by the Western imperialists immediately upon the exiting of the Western colonialists which left them in a state of shock. The same thing was true after slavery was outlawed here in the US. Those transitions were so upending that they essentially forced a global “revolution” upon each of the countries that they left behind. We bemoan other “revolutions” that took place but colonialism created violent “revolutions” all over the world in less than 20 years by just leaving countries behind to figure things out on their own without little to no transition time.

      Just wondered what your thoughts were on that stuff. In your opinion, how should leaders be empowered who are in this frame of mind? The reason I ask, is that when an older individual finds Christ, though they are a new birth spiritually, their age allows them to perceive their faith from a somewhat “spiritual post-colonialism” especially if they are the same age as us or older. The organic process is much more straight forward when the spiritual growth can somewhat match the natural humanistic growth of the individual. I’ve often wondered how to work with those who are older when they come to faith and it seems that their process mirrors more of the post-colonial mind-scape. Thoughts?

    • Chad 12:28 am on May 6, 2010 Permalink

      The flying v may be better metaphor (instinct, etc), but your reflection also made me think of drafting in cycling, sharing the burden, increasing overall speed, etc. The peleton has many interesting dynamics…I’ll leave thAt for another time when not on a cell phone. Fly on. Blessings

    • Mark 7:31 am on May 6, 2010 Permalink

      Fly on yourself Chad! Hope things are going well for you brother! What’s the latest? Send me an email when you’re not on your cell phone. :)

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel